检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕桂兰[1] 吴婧[1] 景影[1] 杜玮[1] 樊荣[1]
机构地区:[1]南京军区南京总医院肾脏病研究所39病区,210002
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2005年第12期882-884,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing
摘 要:目的 探讨在连续性血液净化治疗中指导超滤量调节的最佳评价指标。方法 监测15例危重患者在连续性血液净 化治疗中的中心静脉压、平均动脉压。通过比较在不同指标下调整超滤量后液体管理的效果,评价中心静脉压对反映患者容 量状况的敏感性。结果 比较发现,15例患者中心静脉压与超滤量之间的相关系数为-0.2624,比平均动脉压与超滤量的相 关系数(-0.05)高,两者差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论 连续性血液净化治疗中,监测中心静脉压来评估患者容量状 况较平均动脉压更为敏感,为实现个体化的液体管理提供了更为可靠的指标。Objective To find out a better evaluation indicator to adjust ultrafiltration volume during blood purification. Methods From March to October in 2004, central venous pressure and mean arterial blood pressure of 15 serious patients were measured as indicators to adjust ultrafiltration volume during hemodialysis. The effectiveness of adjusting ultrafiltration volume according to different indicators on the management of blood volume had been compared, and the sensibility of monitoring central venous pressure to reflect patients" volume status was assessed. Results The correlation coefficient(-0. 2624) between central venous pressure and ultrafiltration volume was significantly higher than that between mean arterial blood pressure and ul- trafiltration volume(-0.05). Conclusion During continuous blood purification, central venous pressure was found to be more sensitive than mean arterial blood pressure for the evaluation of the volume status. And monitoring central venous pressure could provide a more exact and reliable indicator for individual liquor management.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90