检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林瑶敏[1] 袁小平[2] 顾建军[1] 吴楚忠[1] 林军[1] 聂时淮[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学眼科中心,广州510060 [2]中山大学附属第二医院放射科
出 处:《影像诊断与介入放射学》2005年第4期212-215,共4页Diagnostic Imaging & Interventional Radiology
摘 要:目的比较X线平片、平扫CT及B超对眼眶异物的诊断价值。方法随机选择92例经过手术或临床证实的眼眶异物病例,回顾分析异物在3种检查中的表现。结果异物在3种检查中均可显像的有57例,仅是CT和超声显像有6例,仅是CT显像2例,仅是超声显像15例,仅是平片显像6例,全部检查都没有显像的有6例。结论3种检查对异物诊断各有其优点缺点,临床医生应该综合应用。Objective To evaluate the image characteristics of X - ray plain film, CT, and B - mode ultrasound in the diagnosis of orbital foreign body. Methods Imaging findings of 92 cases of orbital foreign body were retrospectively analyzed. All cases were proved by surgery or clinic. Results In 57 cases out of 92, foreign body was shown on all three methods; revealed only on CT and B -mode ultrasound in 6 cases; found on CT in 2 cases; only displayed on B -mode ultrasound in 15 cases; and visualized on X -ray plain film in other 6 cases, while in 6 cases the foreign body could not be found with any examinations. Conclusion X - ray plain film, CT, and B - mode ultrasound have respective advantages in diagnosis of orbital foreign body, and should be combined in clinical application.
分 类 号:R445[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229