检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付庆林[1] 孟慧[2] 吕丽红[3] 陈忠堂[2] 邵军[3] 尹金岭[3]
机构地区:[1]新乡医学院第一附属医院心外科,河南新乡453100 [2]济南市中心医院心外科,山东济南250013 [3]山东大学医学院手术学研究室,山东济南250012
出 处:《山东大学学报(医学版)》2005年第12期1151-1154,共4页Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
摘 要:目的:利用兔在体肺保存模型,评价含抑肽酶的改良肺保护液对肺的保护作用。方法:新西兰白兔30只,随机分为对照组、低钾右旋糖酐液(LPD液)组、抑肽酶组,每组10只。制备兔在体左肺保存模型,对照组仅阻断肺门和冷藏,不灌肺保护液,LPD液组和抑肽酶组分别经肺动脉插管,在体灌注LPD液和含抑肽酶的LPD液,完毕后将左肺下叶放入特制的肺保存器内在体低温冷藏2h,移去肺保存器,开放肺门再灌注2h。在实验过程中抽取肺静脉血标本行血气分析,取肺组织行病理学检查,同时检测支气管灌洗液中性粒细胞百分比及肺湿/干重比以评价肺保存效果。结果:抑肽酶组再灌注5min和2h两个时间点肺静脉血氧分压显著高于LPD液组和对照组(P<0.05)。抑肽酶组肺泡出血及肺结构损害分级均较对照组及LPD组轻微(P<0.05)。肺湿/干重比抑肽酶组较对照组和LPD液组均有非常显著的差异(P<0.01)。结论:含抑肽酶的肺保护液对肺的保护效果确切,其保护作用明显优于单纯LPD液。Objective: To explore the protective effect of aprotinin contained LPD (low potassium dextran) solution with rabbit in situ lung preservation models. Methods: Thirty New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups, 10 in each group. In group A (control group), the left lung hilus was clamped without pulmonary artery perfusion. In group B (LPD group) and group C (LPD +aprotinin group), the pulmonary artery was perfused with LPD solution and aprotinin contained LPD solution, respectively. The lungs in all groups were stored at 10℃ in a specially made lung preservation container for 2 hours and then unclamped the lung hilus to re-perfuse the lung for 2 hours. Pulmonary venous blood samples were collected at pre-clamping of lung hilus, 5 minutes and 2 hours after reperfusion for analysis of blood gas. Biopsy of lung tissue was excised for morphological examination reperfusion. Examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid at pre-declamping of lung hilus and 2 hours after was taken for the evaluation of inflammation status.Lung wet/dry weight ratio was detected. Result: PvPO2 (partial pressure of oxygen in pulmonary venous blood) in group C at 5 minutes and 2 hours after reperfusion were significantly higher than those in group A and group B. The morphological lesion was more severe in group A and B than that in group C. The PMN percentage in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in group A and B was significantly higher than that in group C. Left lung wet/dry weight ratio in group C was significantly lower than that in group A and B. Conclusion: The protective effect of aprotinin is apparent for lung protection in animal model. Aprotinin contained lung preservation solution is superior to LPD for lung protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.204.106