检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]同济医科大学心血管病学研究所内科
出 处:《临床心血管病杂志》1996年第1期13-15,共3页Journal of Clinical Cardiology
摘 要:对120例室上性心动过速(SVT)患者的食管心房调搏(TEAP)与心内电生理检查的结果进行比较,发现两者不符有20例,进一步分析表明属TEAP漏诊或误诊,其原因除与SVT自身的电生理特性有关外,更主要的是与TEAP方法学上存在一定缺陷有关。Compared the results of trans-esophageal atrial pacing(TEAP)with those of intracardiac electrophysiology,discord between them was found in 20 of 120 patients with supraventricular tachycardia(SVT).Analysed the results of TEAP and intracardiac electrophysiology,and compared methodology between TEAP and intracardiac electrophysiology,the causes of discord was found mainly due to missing-diagnosis or misdiagnosis of TEM in diagnosing SVT.The reason did not only correlated with the charactristics of electrophysiology of SVT,but more correlated with the disadvantage of methodology of TEM.
分 类 号:R541.710.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3