检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南省郴州市第一人民医院麻醉科,423000
出 处:《实用疼痛学杂志》2006年第1期13-15,共3页Pain Clinic Journal
摘 要:目的观察痛点注射与针刀治疗屈指肌腱狭窄性腱鞘炎的临床效果。方法将 119例屈指肌腱狭窄性腱鞘炎患者随机分成2组,A组为对照组56例,采用消炎镇痛液局部痛点注射治疗;B组为观察组63例,根据临床症状轻重分成Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ4度,Ⅰ度采用痛点注射疗法,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ度采用痛点注射加针刀疗法。结果 A组与B组治愈者分别为20例(35.7%)与 52例(82.5%),有效者分别为44例(81.5%)与61例(96.8%),治愈率及有效率B组明显高于A 组(P<0.01),无效率(A组12例,21.4%;B组2例3.2%)及复发率(A组15例,36.4%;B组1例, 1.6%),B组明显低于A组(P<0.01)。结论痛点注射疗法对屈指肌腱狭窄性腱鞘炎症状较轻、病程较短的Ⅰ度患者疗效高,且损伤小。痛点注射加针刀疗法对Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ度患者的疗效好,且不易复发。Objective To observe the treatment efficacy of trigger point injection and knife-needle for constrictive flexor digitorum tenosynovitis. Methods 119 patients with constrictive flexor digitorum tenosynovitis were allocated randomly into two groups. In group A (control group), 56 patients were treated by trigger point injection with lidocaine and prednisolone acetate; in group B (study group), 63 patients were divided into four subgroup (Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, and Ⅳ) according to the clinical symptoms, and subgroup Ⅰ treated by trigger point injection as control, subgroup Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ treated by trigger point injection and small knifeneedle. Results Cure rate and effective rate were 52 patients (82.5%) and 56 patients (96.8%) respectively in group B, which were higher than that in group A, 20 patients (35.7%) and 44 patients (81.5%). Recurrent rate was also lower in group B ( 1 case) than in group A ( 15 cases). Conclusion Trigger point injection is an effective method for treatment of constrictive flexor digitorum tenosynovitis with mild symptom and short duration; combining trigger point and small knife-needle are more effective and lower recurrent rate for severe symptom.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117