检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李靖[1] 梁平[1] 杨彤翰[1] 黄小兵[1] 李洪艳[1] 刘锡能[1] 左国华[1] 丁生才[1]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学新桥医院肝胆外科,重庆400037
出 处:《西部医学》2006年第1期50-51,共2页Medical Journal of West China
摘 要:目的 探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)治疗急性胆囊炎的可行性。方法 对2003年7月-2005年5月施行LC的229例急性胆囊炎病例(A组)进行回顾分析,并随机选择同期进行的非急性胆囊炎LC病例245例(B组)进行对照。结果 A组中转开腹9例,中转率3.93%,B组中转开腹4例,中转率1.63%,两组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);平均手术时间:A组(59.3±12.6)min,B组(32.4±5.7)min,两组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);术后胃肠功能恢复时间:A组(25.8±4.6)h,B组(25.1±3.7)h,两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);术后平均住院天数:A组(3.35±0.91)d,B组(3.17±0.89)d,两组相似(P〉0.05)。两组均无术中及术后并发症。结论 急性胆囊炎行LC是安全可行的,认真辨清胆囊三角区关系是LC成功的关键。Objective To investigate the probability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Methods Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in 229 patients with acute cholecystitls(group A) and 245 patients without acute cholecystitis(group B) from July 2003 to May 2005 were retrospectively analysed. Results Nine cases were changed to laparotomy (3.93%) in group A,and four cases to laparotomy (1. 63%) in group B (P〈0.01). The average time for operation were 59.3 min ± 12.6 min in group A and 32.4 min ± 5.7 min in group B (P〈0.01). The comeback time for gastrointestinal function was 25.8 h ±4.6 h in group A and 25.1 h ±3.7 h in group B (P〉0.05). The average hospitalization time after operation was 3.35 d ±0.91 d in group A and 3.17 d± 0. 89 d in group B (P〉 0. 05). All patients recovered without any complication. Conclusion Laparoscoplc cholecystectomy is a safe and effective method for acute cholecystltis. Corrective recognition of Calot's triangle may be the key factor to achieve successful operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145