检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭清[1] 王小合[1] 李晓惠[2] 马海燕[1] 汪胜[1] 许亮文[1] 李宇阳[1]
机构地区:[1]杭州师范学院卫生政策与管理研究所,杭州310018 [2]深圳职业技术学院医护系,深圳518055
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2006年第1期50-53,共4页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:2002年国家社会科学基金(02CSH011)。
摘 要:目的:探讨洛伦茨曲线和基尼系数对社区卫生服务资源配置公平性评价的效果,为社区卫生资源合理配置评价方法提供实践依据。方法:采用分层整群随机抽样的方法,对5城市7城区社区卫生服务主管机构采取入户访谈和专题讨论的方式进行调查。结果:调查地区社区卫生技术人员、社区卫生服务机构资源在人口配置上其Gini系数分别为0.1962、0.2421,政府对社区卫生服务投入经费Gini系数为0.5759,接近高度不公平的危险状态。结论:调查地区政府对社区卫生服务投入经费公平程度较低,而社区卫生技术人员和社区卫生服务机构资源在人口配置上已达到较好的公平性。Object: To investigate the effect in the evaluation on fair resource allocation for community health services by the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient, and provide the empirical study result for applying these methods in evaluation of the above mentioned aspect. Methods: 7 organizations were randomly selected with cluster sampling in 5 cities by means of questionnaire and observation. Results: the results of analysis by the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient showed that the Gini coefficient were separately 0.1962, 0.2421 , according to medical workers and organ numbers of the community health service on local population resource distributing, but the Gini coefficient was 0.5759 in terms of local governments devoting outlay for the community health service, the Gini coefficient was close to inequity danger status. Conclusions: The equity degree is lower on local governments of investigated areas for devoting ouday of the community health service, however the equity degree is approach to better equity on according to medical workers and organ numbers of the community health service in term of local population resource distributing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28