检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨金彪[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084
出 处:《青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2005年第4期87-90,共4页Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基 金:司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研重点项目(04SFB1007)
摘 要:依据共犯处罚根据论中的修正的惹起说,以及对实行行为的实质理解,在无身份者参与司法工作人员实施的真正身份犯的场合,无身份者不仅可以构成教唆犯或者帮助犯,而且还可以构成共同正犯。甚至无身份者还完全可以利用司法工作人员实施犯罪,构成真正身份犯的间接正犯,不过这种场合下司法工作人员不构成犯罪,二者不再构成共同犯罪。By the modified provoking theory, one of the theories which is named foundations of punishment on accomplices, and according to the substantial interpretation to accomplishment conduct, the participators without special status who participate the crimes committed by the judicial officers which can only be committed by an offender with special status, can not only be identified as abettors or assistors but also be recognized as joint principal offenders. The participators without special status can be interpreted as indirect principal offenders sometimes, when availing himself/herself of the judicial officers to accomplish a crime. The judicial officers can not be condemned as accomplices with participators without special status, because his/her conduct can not be interpreted as a crime on such situation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28