检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘世茹[1] 廖行忠[1] 王晓林[1] 李东平[1] 张锋[1] 程跃[1] 石章铁[2]
机构地区:[1]成都中医药大学附属医院,成都610072 [2]成都中医药大学,03级研究生成都610072
出 处:《大肠肛门病外科杂志》2005年第4期262-263,共2页Journal of Coloproctological Surgery
摘 要:目的:寻求慢性肛裂的最佳手术方法。方法:将80例慢性肛裂病人随机分成2组,对照组(40例)采用常规纵切横缝术;治疗组(40例)采用改良纵切横缝术。对2组患者的术后疗效、愈合时间、术后并发症等进行观察分析。结果:对照组与治疗组在愈合时间,术后并发症方面有显著差异。结论:改良术式操作简便,疗效确切,便于临床推广使用。Objective:To seek the best procedure for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Methods:80 patients with chronic anal fissure were divided randomizedly into two groups. The control group (40 patients) received conventional longitudinally section transverse suture procedure, and the treatment group (40 patients) with improved longitudinally section transverse suture procedure. Effectiveness, healing time and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: There were significant differences in healing time and postoperative complications between the two groups. Conclusion: This improved procedure is simple, effective, easy to clinical generalization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4