左氧氟沙星序贯疗法与静脉内输注疗法治疗下呼吸道感染疗效比较  

Comparison in the curative effect between levofloxacin sequential therapy and intravenous drip for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection

作　　者：栾杰[1] 周国庆[1] 鹿翠香[1] 司凯英[1] 王守春[1] 王晓晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]大庆龙南医院,黑龙江大庆163453

出　　处：《中国感染控制杂志》2006年第1期39-41,共3页Chinese Journal of Infection Control

摘　　要：目的比较左氧氟沙星序贯疗法和静脉内输注疗法治疗下呼吸道感染的疗效。方法选择下呼吸道感染患者67例,随机分为治疗组35例和对照组32例。治疗组采用左氧氟沙星序贯疗法,对照组采用静脉内输注疗法,疗程均为10 d。结果左氧氟沙星序贯疗法有效率为91.43%,细菌清除率为87.10%;静脉内输注疗法有效率为93.75%,细菌清除率为89.29%;两组间比较,有效率、细菌清除率差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论左氧氟沙星序贯疗法治疗下呼吸道感染与静脉内输注疗法疗效相似,但序贯疗法更安全、经济、方便,值得临床推广。Objective To compare the curative effect between levofloxacin sequential therapy and intravenous drip for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection. Methods Sixty-seven patients with lower respiratory tract infection were divided into treatment （35 cases） and control （32 cases） group. Patients in the treatment group received levofloxacin sequential therapy, and patients in the control group received intravenous drip, the average treatment courses were all 10 days Results The effective rate and bacterial clearance rate in the treatment group was 91.43% and 87.10% respectively, and the effective rate and bacterial clearance rate in the control group was 93.75% and 89.29% respectively; there were no significant difference in both effective and bacterial clearance rates between two groups （ P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion There is similar curative effect for the treatment of lower respiratory infection by levofloxacin sequential therapy and intravenous drip, but sequential therapy is safer, more economic and convenient.

关 键 词：左氧氟沙星 序贯疗法 呼吸道感染 输注 静脉内 治疗应用 

分 类 号：R969.4[医药卫生—药理学]