意义与局限:舍勒哲学人类学的评价  

Meaning And Limitation:the Evaluation of Scheler′s Philosophical Anthropology

作　　者：刘翠[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学人文与公共管理学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2005年第4期8-15,共8页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

摘　　要：舍勒的哲学人类学是内在于现代人本主义和文化哲学的重要理论形态。在哲学研究气质上,舍勒哲学人类学超越了乐观与悲观的两极对立,蕴涵着深刻的自我批判和自我超越特征;在人的研究的思路上,开创了对人的存在的本体论观照的新视野、存在论研究的新领域并确立了新的哲学研究范式———人类学范式;在哲学史的发展中,克服了传统哲学对于人的片面理解,以科学与形而上学相结合的方法论超越了传统哲学方法论的片面性,并对整个现代西方哲学进程产生了总体影响;同时也为所有关于人的科学奠定了基础。而舍勒哲学人类学的局限则体现在缺乏前后一致的方法论和缺乏实践维度的观照。Scheler＇s philosophical anthropology is an important theorical formation in modem humanism and cultural philosophy. It has important value on the evaluation of Scheler＇s philosophical anthropology. On temperament of philosophy, Scheler＇s philoophical anthropology oversteps optimistic antagonistic to pessimistic, contains profound charactertic of self-critique and selfsurpass; on the mentality of human studing, it initiates a new vision of ontology awareness on humanbeing, a new field on human existence and establishes a new philosophical normal form , anthropological normal form. In the prosess of philosophy, it eliminates onesidedness of traditional philosophy on human , overcomes one- sidedness by means of science combining with metaphysics, and exerts general influence on modem philosophy, lays the foundations on all human science at the same time. The limitation of Scheler＇s philosophical anthropology lies in lacking the same methodology and praxsis view.

关 键 词：哲学人类学 本体论 人类学范式 

分 类 号：B089.3[哲学宗教—哲学理论]