《竹书纪年》与夏商周断代工程西周王年的比较研究  

A Comparative Study on the Chronicle Division of the Western Zhou Dynasty in the Bamboo Annals and the Report of the Xia-Shang-Zhou Dynasties Division Project

作　　者：张富祥[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学文史哲研究院

出　　处：《史学月刊》2006年第1期20-28,共9页Journal of Historical Science

摘　　要：今本《竹书纪年》中的西周年代大略承古本《竹书纪年》而来,但作了不少改动。其中最大的改动是周初武王、成王的在位年数误取刘歆《世经》的推排结果,以成王十八年为古本《纪年》所记西周年数共257年的上限,遂使武王克商年亦提前了24年。由今本推校和恢复古本的记载,并以所得结果与夏商周断代工程所拟《夏商周年表》的西周部分相比较,可知后者除个别王年(懿王元年)准确无误外,其他都不可据。工程忽视《纪年》,主要失误有二:一是相信旧说,对穆王在位年数估计过高;二是没有注意到西周晚期“共和”不单独纪年的事实。Except some corrections, the chronicle division of the Western Zhou Dynasty in the ＂Modern Text＂ of the Barnboo Annals is generally derived from the ＂Ancient Text＂. The most notable correction is that by mistakenly adopting the inference, which is from Liu Xin＇s Shijing, of the years of reigning of Emperor Wuwang and Emperor Chengwang in the early Zhou Dynasty , the ＂Modern Text＂ regards the 18^th year of Chengwang＇s reign over Zhou Dynasty as the beginning of the overall 257 years of Zhou Dynasty＇s reign recorded in the ＂Ancient Text＂, therefore, the year of Wuwang＇s Conquering Shang Dynasty is brought forward for 24 years. In this article, by comparing the results obtained by reference from the ＂Modern Text＂ and renewing the record of the ＂Ancient Text＂ of the Bamboo Annals with those of the Western Zhou Dynasty section in the Xia-Shang-Zhou Chronological Table studied out in the Xia-Shang-Zhou Dynasties Project, the author reaches the conclusion that the chronicle division of the Western Zhou Dynasty section in the Xia-ShangZhou Chronological Table is held to be unauthentic except for a few correct dates.

关 键 词：《竹书纪年》 夏商周断代工程 西周王年 

分 类 号：K221[历史地理—历史学] K04[历史地理—中国史]