检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]新疆医科大学第一附属医院麻醉科,新疆乌鲁木齐830054
出 处:《新疆医科大学学报》2006年第1期65-66,共2页Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
摘 要:目的:探讨两种不同麻醉方法在胃镜检查术中的应用效果。方法:心功能ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ级的胃镜检查患者30例,随机均分为2组:Ⅰ组应用异丙酚复合芬太尼,Ⅱ组利多卡因咽喉表面麻醉后再应用异丙酚复合芬太尼。同时开放静脉,2组均静注芬太尼1μg/kg,3 min后静注异丙酚1 mg/kg,插镜过程中出现体动酌情追加异丙酚10-30 mg。观察记录胃镜检查过程中的血液动力学变化、不良反应、用药剂量及胃镜操作时间、病人苏醒时间.评估麻醉方法的有效性和可行性。结果:插镜时Ⅰ组心率、收缩压和平均动脉压均明显高于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05-0.01),异丙酚的总用药量Ⅰ组明显大于Ⅱ组(P<0.01),苏醒时间Ⅰ组明显较Ⅱ组延长(P<0. 01)。2组不良反应发生率差异有统计学意义。结论:采用2%利多卡因咽喉表面麻醉,再复合异丙酚及小剂量芬太尼静脉麻醉有利于减轻胃镜插镜时的不良反应,可维持麻醉的平稳性,是无痛胃镜检查的最为理想、安全的麻醉方法。Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of different anesthesia methods applying for gastros copy. Methods: Thirty ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ patients scheduled for gastroscopy were randomly divided into 2 groups: propofol- fentanil group (group I, n = 15) and throat surface anaesthetizing- propofol- fentanil group (group Ⅱ , n =15). Sprayed 2 ml of 2% lidocaine toward the throat in group II. At the same time had a vein open. Patients in both groups were given fentanil 1 μg/kg intravenously. Three minutes later injected propofol 1 ~ 1. 5 mg/kg. If the patients reached class iV of Ramsay score, inserted the gastro scope. More propofol was given, 10~30 mg at a time, if there were the signs of light anesthesia such as ; cough and movement. Hemodynamic variables, such as HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, SpO2, were continuously monitored and recorded before, during and after gastroscopy. At the same time noted the total drug consumption,the recovery time and the ill effects. Results: In group Ⅱ HR, SBP and MAP were significantly higher than that in group Ⅰ while inserting the gastroscope. The total propofol consumption, and the recovery time in grope Ⅰ was significantly larger than that in group Ⅱ. The incidence of side effects in group I was also higher. Conclusion: Propofol combined with small dose of fentanil after surface anaesthesia of throat with 2% lidocaine showed higher anesthesia quality, less side effects, and more rapid and smooth recovery. In current this technique is an effective, safe anesthesia method for painless gastroscopy, and worth popularizing and applying clinically.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.34.209