检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李易[1] 李建美[1] 卢竞前[1] 杨锋[1] 吕云[1] 洪云飞[1] 李玉[1] 张荣华[1] 吴燕[1]
机构地区:[1]云南省红十字会医院心脏中心内科
出 处:《中国心血管病研究》2006年第2期112-114,共3页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research
摘 要:目的比较分析易化PCI和常规PCI治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)的临床疗效。方法81例AMI患者分别行易化PCI术(42例)和常规PCI术(39例),对比两组梗塞相关血管(IRA)开通率、左心室功能、不良反应。结果易化PCI组开通率为97.6%41/42),常规PCI组开通率为79.5%31/39),出院时两组射血分数值为(53.8±6.7)%((和(50.2±5.2)%;易化PCI组无死亡,常规PCI组死亡6例,两组出血、再梗死、脑卒中等不良反应差异无统计学意义。结论易化PCI治疗AMI可以尽快开通罪犯血管,改善心功能,安全有效,并发症少,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare the clinical effect of facilitated PCI and routine PCI in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Methods 81 AMI patients were divided into facilitated PCI group (n=42)and routine PCI group (n= 39). Operation success rate, left ventricular function and adverse events were compared in the two groups. Results The successful rate of facilitated PCI group was 41/42, while routine PCI group was 31/39. The EF in facilitated PCI group was (53.8±6.7)% and in routine PCI group was (50.2±5.2)%. No patient died in facilitated PCI group while 6 death in routine PCI group. There were no different with bleeding, re-infraction or stroke in two group. Conclusion Facilitated PCI can reperfuse infarction related artery faster, improve heart function and is safe, efficient treatment for AMI.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3