概念框架及其汉语证据  

On Conceptual Frame and Its Chinese Evidence

作　　者：程琪龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学外国语学院,200433

出　　处：《汉语学报》2006年第1期3-9,共7页Chinese Linguistics

摘　　要：本文讨论两个问题:(1)为什么理论模式要表述概念语义?(2)为什么表述概念语义不能用语法语义结构,而要增设概念框架?根据概念框架和语义结构的不同表述范围,文章以汉语小句为例,论证将概念语义和语法语义分开的理论表述意义。概念框架的增设能让理论模式合理表述不同小句之间概念内容的异同。This paper discusses two topics: (1) Why should a theoretical model be used to account for conceptual meaning? (2) Why should the conceptual frames instead of grammatical structures be used to account for conceptual meaning? According to the descriptive differences, the paper argues, with Chinese clauses as evidence, for the separation of conceptual meaning from grammatical meaning. Conceptual frames, thus, can be constructed to account for conceptual similarities and differences among clauses.

关 键 词：认知功能模式 概念框架 语义结构 汉语 证据 理论表述 语法 增设 小句 

分 类 号：H14[语言文字—汉语]