检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕晓杰[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084
出 处:《上海财经大学学报》2006年第1期37-44,共8页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:特定产品过渡性保障机制是中国入世议定书中最具争议的内容之一。中国入世议定书第16条规定,如果中国的进口扰乱了其他WTO成员的国内市场,该WTO成员可以针对急速增加的中国进口采取保障措施。该机制允许其他WTO成员在一定条件下只针对来源于中国的产品进口采取保障措施,不同于WTO《保障措施协议》所要求的在最惠国原则基础之上不对产品的来源进行选择性实施保障措施的规定。本文的目的就在于探讨中国入世议定书第16条特定产品过渡性保障机制与WTO《保障措施协议》的关系,尝试回答WTO《保障措施协议》能否适用于特定产品过渡性保障机制这一问题。The transitional product-specific safeguard regime is one of the most controversial issues in the China's Accession Protocol. Accord ring to the article16th, in cases where products of Chinese origin cause domestic market disruption of any other WTO member, this member has the right to pursue safeguard measures toward fast increased Chinese products. It permits other WTO members to pursue safeguard measures only to Chinese products in the given condition, which is different from the requirement of WTO Safeguards Agreement according to which selective safeguard measures are not permitted on the basis of "most favored nation" principle. This article focuses mainly on the relationship between transitional product-specific safeguard regime and WTO Safeguards Agreement and whether the WTO Safeguards Agreement, as a more general regulative framework, applies to the review of safeguards measures initiated under the transitional product-specific safeguard regime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15