检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王胜[1] 孙忠人[2] 李春玲 单丽莉[2] 张晓雷[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军255医院中医康复中心,唐山063000 [2]黑龙江中医药大学附属二院,哈尔滨150001 [3]唐山市丰润区第二医院
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2006年第2期21-23,共3页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅骨干教师资助项目(黑教科计划字2001010号)
摘 要:目的比较整体电针、局部电针、传统手针治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效差异。方法将95例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为电针治疗组、电针对照组、手针对照组,从临床疗效、疼痛综合评分对各组进行对比分析。结果各组治愈显效率分别为81.3%、65.6%、58.1%,电针治疗组优于对照组(P<0.01);症状、体征积分差值比较电针治疗组均优于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论电针治疗腰椎间盘突出症,无论是镇痛、改善症状,还是改善体征方面,都优于传统手针,而整体电针又优于局部电针。Objective To compare the curative effects of holistic electroacupuncture,local electroacupuncture and traditional manual acupuncture on lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. Methods Ninety-five patients with lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion were randomly allocated to electroacupuncture treatment, electroacupuncture control and manual acupuncture control groups. The curative effects and the pain scores were compared between the groups, Results The cure and marked efficacy rate was 81.3% ,65.6% and 58.1% ,respectively,in the groups. It was higher in the electroacupuncture treatment group than in the electroacupuncture control group (P 〈0.01 ). A comparison of the symptom and sign score differences showed that the effect was better in the electroacupuncture treatment group than in the control groups(P 〈 O. 05, P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Electroacupuncture in more effective than traditional manual acupuncture in treating lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion, not only in stopping the pain but also in relieving the symptoms and signs.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117