检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院研究生院中国科学院心理研究所国家心理健康重点实验室,北京100101 [2]中国人民大学社会心理研究所,北京100872
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2006年第1期33-35,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助(项目号:30270472)
摘 要:目的:探讨阅读技能与认知灵活性的内在关系,为阅读困难儿童认知灵活性的临床干预提供新的实证依据。方法:通过一般领域多维度卡片分类测验、识字量和阅读理解测验对44名阅读困难儿童和对照组儿童进行测试。结果:①认知灵活性与汉语识字量和阅读理解水平之间均存在显著相关;②一般儿童认知灵活性总体水平显著高于阅读困难儿童;③阅读困难儿童认知灵活性随年级增长的趋势不同于一般儿童。结论:认知灵活性与阅读技能存在彼此间的相互影响而非先后因果关系,结合语言知识与技能的特殊领域认知灵活性训练将可能对阅读困难的干预产生更好的临床效果。Objective: To provide empirical evidences for clinical intervention of reading disabilities by investigating and comparing developmental characteristics of cognitive flexibility between the RD and Non-RD children. Methods: Using domain-general multiple classification test, phrase-making task and reading comprehension test as experimental materials. Results: (1)Significant correlations exist among cognitive flexibility, literacy and reading comprehension; (2) Cognitive flexibility level of RD children was significantly lower than that of non-RD group;(3)Compared with non-RD children, RD children were found to have different developmental tendency with increasing grades. Conclusion: Mutual enhancing effects exist between reading skills and cognitive flexibility instead of cause-and-effect relations; therefore, reading-specific cognitive flexibility training combined with language knowledge and skills wouht make better effects on the RD intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.164.105