检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学心理与行为科学系
出 处:《中国学校卫生》2006年第2期141-142,共2页Chinese Journal of School Health
摘 要:目的探讨大学生问题解决能力的增强机制,进一步为压力管理干预实践提供依据。方法对372名大学生进行问题解决评价量表、一般自我效能量表以及前摄性应对量表调查。结果采用AMOS进行路径分析,结果显示一般自我效能、前摄性应对、反省性应对和支持寻求对问题解决能力的3个因素(问题解决信心、趋近-回避风格、问题控制)具有不同的影响效应和机制。结论增强大学生问题解决能力,应当考虑到不同的作用机制,采用前摄性效能增强策略是提高问题解决能力的关键。Objective To explore the improving mechanism of problem solving among college students, and to provide evidence for stress management experiment. Methods A total of 372 college students were chosen to complete the Problem Solving Inventory, General Self-efficacy Scale and Proactive Coping Scale. Results Path analysis by AMOS indicated that self-efficacy, proactive coping, reflective coping and instrumental support seeking had different effective efficacy and mechanism on three factors of problem solving ability (problem solving confidence, approach-avoidance style and problem control). Conclusion Different functional mechanism should be considered to improve college students' problem solving ability. Using proactive coping is the key to improve problem solving ability.
分 类 号:R179[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健] R359.6[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

