APACHEⅡ评分在ICU护理中的应用与研究  被引量:6

Application and Research of APACHEⅡ Score in ICU Nursing

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:谢莉[1] 张剑宁[1] 覃仕英[1] 张丽[1] 王毓[1] 刘玉芳[1] 

机构地区:[1]第四军医大学西京医院全军神经外科研究所,陕西西安710032

出  处:《解放军护理杂志》2006年第2期1-3,共3页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army

基  金:西京医院新技术基金资助(200432)

摘  要:目的探讨APACHEⅡ评分评价疾病严重程度的有效性,分析APACHEⅡ评分中不同因素对评分的影响程度。方法对ICU的116例患者进行APACHEⅡ评分,通过对死亡组与存活组评分的比较,检测APACHEⅡ评分的有效性;对APACHEⅡ评分系统中包含的各评分因素进行回归分析,得出影响评分的重要因素。结果存活组与死亡组在APACHEⅡ分值上有显著差异(P<0.05),APACHEⅡ评分对预测病情的危重程度有统计学意义(P<0.05);得出影响APACHEⅡ评分的6个最重要因素,分别为格拉斯昏迷评分、脉搏血氧饱和度SaO2、白细胞计数、血清K+、既往健康状况及并发症评分。结论APACHEⅡ评分系统可以较准确地评价神经外科ICU患者的病情严重程度,预测病死率,为神经外科ICU的护理工作提供有益的指导。Objective To investigate the validity of assessing disease severity degree by APACHE Ⅱ score, so as to analyze the influencing extent of different factors in APACHE Ⅱ score. Methods One hundred and sixteen patients enrolled in ICU unit were evaluated by APACHE Ⅱ score, and the validity of APACHE Ⅱ score was investigated by comparing the score in survival group with that in death group. The regression analysis was used to identify more important influence factors in APACHE Ⅱ scoring system. Results There was significant difference between APACHEⅡ score in survival group and that in death group. APACHEⅡ score had statistical significance for evaluating disease severity degree. There were 6 important influence factors in APACHEⅡ scoring system,including Glasgow coma scale score (GCSS) , saturation of pulse oxygen ( SaO2 ), white blood cell count ( WBCC ), serum potassium, chronic heath status and complication score. Conclusion APACHE Ⅱ scoring system is capable of assessing relatively the disease severity degree and prognosticating mortality rate for patients in neurosurgical ICU, and providing valuable directions for neurosurgical ICU nursing.

关 键 词:APACHEⅡ评分 ICU 护理 

分 类 号:R473.52[医药卫生—护理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象