检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢莉[1] 张剑宁[1] 覃仕英[1] 张丽[1] 王毓[1] 刘玉芳[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学西京医院全军神经外科研究所,陕西西安710032
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2006年第2期1-3,共3页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
基 金:西京医院新技术基金资助(200432)
摘 要:目的探讨APACHEⅡ评分评价疾病严重程度的有效性,分析APACHEⅡ评分中不同因素对评分的影响程度。方法对ICU的116例患者进行APACHEⅡ评分,通过对死亡组与存活组评分的比较,检测APACHEⅡ评分的有效性;对APACHEⅡ评分系统中包含的各评分因素进行回归分析,得出影响评分的重要因素。结果存活组与死亡组在APACHEⅡ分值上有显著差异(P<0.05),APACHEⅡ评分对预测病情的危重程度有统计学意义(P<0.05);得出影响APACHEⅡ评分的6个最重要因素,分别为格拉斯昏迷评分、脉搏血氧饱和度SaO2、白细胞计数、血清K+、既往健康状况及并发症评分。结论APACHEⅡ评分系统可以较准确地评价神经外科ICU患者的病情严重程度,预测病死率,为神经外科ICU的护理工作提供有益的指导。Objective To investigate the validity of assessing disease severity degree by APACHE Ⅱ score, so as to analyze the influencing extent of different factors in APACHE Ⅱ score. Methods One hundred and sixteen patients enrolled in ICU unit were evaluated by APACHE Ⅱ score, and the validity of APACHE Ⅱ score was investigated by comparing the score in survival group with that in death group. The regression analysis was used to identify more important influence factors in APACHE Ⅱ scoring system. Results There was significant difference between APACHEⅡ score in survival group and that in death group. APACHEⅡ score had statistical significance for evaluating disease severity degree. There were 6 important influence factors in APACHEⅡ scoring system,including Glasgow coma scale score (GCSS) , saturation of pulse oxygen ( SaO2 ), white blood cell count ( WBCC ), serum potassium, chronic heath status and complication score. Conclusion APACHE Ⅱ scoring system is capable of assessing relatively the disease severity degree and prognosticating mortality rate for patients in neurosurgical ICU, and providing valuable directions for neurosurgical ICU nursing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229