头孢噻吩与头孢唑啉对细菌性感染150例疗效比较  

Cefalotin Versus Cefazolin in Treating 150 Patients with Bacterial Infections

作　　者：庄玲璇 

机构地区：[1]南靖县医院,南靖363600

出　　处：《海峡药学》2006年第1期120-121,共2页Strait Pharmaceutical Journal

摘　　要：目的观察头孢噻吩治疗细菌性感染的疗效。方法150例细菌性感染患者．随机分成两组，分别接受头孢噻吩和头孢唑啉．疗程7～14d。结量总有效率头孢噻吩组97.3％，优于以头孢唑啉组96．7% P〈0．05；头孢嘻吩对细菌的敏感率。7．3％．优于头孢唑啉组94．3%（P〈0.05）.结论头孢噻吩是治疗细菌感染有效的抗生素。OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of cefalotin in the treatment of bacterial infections. METHODS A randomized controlled clinical trial on cefalotin and cefazolin was conducted for the treatment of 150 patients with bacterial infections for 7-14d. RESULTS The total effecteive rate of the cefalotin group was 97.3% and the cefazolin group was 86.7%, P〈0. 05. The sensibility rate to hacterial of two groups were 97.3% and 89.3 % respectively （P〈0.05）. CONCLUSION Cefalotin is and effective antibiotic to bacterial infections.

关 键 词：头孢噻吩 头孢唑啉 细菌性感染 

分 类 号：R969.4[医药卫生—药理学]