检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大庆石油学院经济管理学院,黑龙江大庆163318
出 处:《中国石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第1期5-8,共4页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)
基 金:黑龙江省自然科学基金资助项目(ZTG2005-36);黑龙江省社会科学基金资助项目(10552002)的部分阶段性研究成果
摘 要:国外各主要产油国普遍征收矿区使用费,并确定适合本国油气资源状况的矿区使用费费率。我国油气资源征收的资源税相当于矿区使用费,与矿区使用费相比,资源税税额存在从量计征不够合理、对油气资源的差别性考虑不够、天然气税额偏高、资源税税额与国内矿区使用费费率难以衔接等问题,建议借鉴矿区使用费费率经验调整我国油气资源税税额。Most of oil - producing countries abroad generally levy mineral royalty and determine their mineral royalty rates which are suitable for their own situation of oil and gas resources. Resource tax that our country levies is equivalent to mineral royalty. Compared with mineral royalty, there are many problems in resource tax rates. The main problems are as follows: it is unreasonable to levy resource tax by quantity; less consideration is given to the differences between oil and gas resources; tax rates on natural gas are higher, and it is difficult to connect resource tax rates to mineral royalty rates in China. The writers suggest that the government should adjust the rates of resource tax on the basis of experience in mineral royalty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158