试论我国证券民事诉讼形式之完善路径  

A Tentative Study of the Ways to Improve the Litigation Form of Securities Action in China

作　　者：钟志勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2006年第2期90-95,共6页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：文章从法律、经济和政治三个角度剖析了最高人民法院排除美国式集团诉讼的原因,认为证券民事侵权诉讼适用共同诉讼有三大局限性。应正确认识集团诉讼,并建议我国证券民事诉讼形式的完善可以分三步进行:第一步,引入人数不确定的代表人诉讼;第二步,对共同诉讼加以改造,使之向集团诉讼演进;第三步,待条件成熟时,修改民事诉讼法及相关法律,全面引入集团诉讼。The article analyzes the reasons of the Supreme People＇s Court of China＇s non-adoption of American class action from legal, economical and political perspectives, and suggests that there are three limitations in the application of joint litigation to tort action of securities. The article points out that we should form a correct idea about class action and argues that the way to improve the litigation form of securities action can be divided into three steps. Firstly, representative action with undetermined number of plaintiffs should be introduced; Secondly, joint litigation should be reformed and made close to class action. Thirdly, when proper conditions appear, we shall amend civil procedural law and introduce American class action completely.

关 键 词：集团诉讼 共同诉讼 证券法 民事诉讼法 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]