检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王铮[1] 蒋轶红[2] 吴静[1] 郑一萍[1] 黎华群[3]
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学地理信息教育部重点实验室 [2]香港中文大学 [3]乔治梅森大学,弗吉尼亚220304444
出 处:《生态学报》2006年第2期423-431,共9页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(40371007);中国科学院政策与管理研究所所长基金资助项目~~
摘 要:建立了包含技术进步作用的CO2减排经济影响的宏观经济模型,基于这个模型,开展了中国减排CO2经济影响的政策模拟,研究发现,中国每年降低排放0.2%的排放量(少增0.2%),到2050年GDP会比不控制下降5.12%,但是最高还能保持GDP年增长率为7.2%左右,如果中国承担年少排0.5%的减排任务,从2000年到2050年相当于50a少排放12.4%,GDP的年增长率的平均值为6%左右。如果中国加大教育科研投资0.5%GDP,则不仅减排的影响可以克服,而且到2050年GDP提高25%左右。This study considers China' s potential CO2 abatement and its subsequent impacts on the aggregated GDP growth. Based on a specified macro-economic model, several alternative of Chinese CO2 abatement were development, and their respective impacts on Chinese GDP growth performance were simulated. As revealed by the simulating results, a reduction of 0.2 percent in the growing Chinese CO2 emission would bring about an annual average GDP growth rate of 7.2 percent, and by 2050 the aggregated GDP of China would shrink by 5.12 percentage if compared it to the scenario without abatement. Moreover, a reduction of 0.5 percent in the growing CO2 emission would reduce 12.4 percent of China' s total CO2 emission over 2000 - 2050, which would also reduce the Chinese GDP growth rate to be 6 percent per annum. Finally, if the Chinese government increase its investments on education and R&D by 0.5 percent of GDP, not only would the negative effects of CO2 abatement be absorbed, but an annual average GDP growth rate of 11.6 percent would created through 2050.
分 类 号:X321[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3