检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学经济学院,湖北武汉430074 [2]长沙理工大学经济学院,湖南长沙410076
出 处:《金融理论与实践》2006年第3期3-6,共4页Financial Theory and Practice
基 金:国家自然科学基金应急课题项目<中国期货市场效率研究>(项目号:70441022)
摘 要:做市商机制和连续竞价机制是现代期货市场主流的两类交易机制,连续竞价机制则成本较低,价格信号反应灵敏;做市商机制透明、公正,市场连续性较好,代表着期货市场交易机制的未来发展方向。通过对期货市场微观交易结构及价格形成机制的模型研究,结合我国的实际情况,比较考察了几种典型的期货交易机制在不同交易结构下的价格形成效率,对我国期货市场转型完善时期具有现实意义。There are two main mechanisms in modern futures market: dealer trading mechanism and auction trading mechanism. Auction trading mechanism has a lower trading cost but a more sensitive price information system, while dealer trading mechanism with the quality of transparency, justice and a better market continuity represents the prospect of futures trading mechanism. Based on studying the microstructure and pricing mechanism model of the futures market and considering the reality of our country's market, this paper examines and compares the efficiencies of three typical pricing mechanisms in different trading structures. According to this paper, it is of realistic significance to conduct an intensive research in this issue during the transformation and improvement period of our futures market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7