社会热点评论中的教条主义与泛道德化——从佘祥林冤案切入  

Dogmatism and Moral Oversimplification in the Comments on Social Incidents

作　　者：陈柏峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,430074

出　　处：《开放时代》2006年第2期98-117,共20页Open Times

摘　　要：借助于对佘祥林冤案及围绕这一事件的法律话语与法律实践的梳理,可以发现,当代中国法律人的话语大致是一种个人权利至上和程序正义至上的自由主义法治理论。这种理论存在诸多缺陷:理论视野过于狭窄,充满对实际法律生活的想像,缺乏对司法的制度环境、社会条件的全盘关注和同情理解,表现出很强的教条主义倾向和泛道德化情绪。实际上,佘祥林冤案既是制度环境的产物,也是科学与经济发展水平的产物。An analysis of the unjust verdict on She Xianglin and the legal wordings and legal practice around it shows that Chinese lawyers think highly of individual rights and justice of procedure, and worship the liberal theory of legalization. However, this theory has a great deal of defects. Its vision is so narrow and so fanciful about real legal life. It lacks sympathetic understanding of the institutional environment and social circumstances under which law and justice are conducted, and it is exposed to a very strong dogmatic tendency and moral oversimplification.

关 键 词：教条主义 道德化 冤案 社会热点 评论 经济发展水平 法律实践 法律话语 法治理论 自由主义 

分 类 号：D920.5[政治法律—法学]