附带诉讼制度构建质疑——兼论行政、民事纠纷交织案件的处理  

A Tentative Study on the Construction of Incidental Litigation-the Settle of Case Interlaced with Administrative Dispute and Civil Dispute

作　　者：郭明龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2006年第2期96-99,共4页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要：对于行政与民事纠纷相交织的重合案件,学界有主张认为应当构建附带诉讼进行处理,尽管对具体的附带方式学者之间也有分歧。“附带诉讼”的理论基础是“法院判决统一”论。“附带诉讼”在理论上是为避免民、行诉讼程序得出矛盾结论;在实践上是为了贯彻诉讼经济原则要求。但其理论基础并不必然正当,诉讼效益的追求也经不起实证考察。文章认为,对于该类案件的处理方式应当坚持民事、行政诉讼程序分别处理,民事对具体行政行为进行全面审查,其结论可以和行政诉讼的认定不一致。Administrative dispute and civil dispute may be interlaced sometimes. It becomes a serious and urgent problem for academic area to solve. Some scholars take the view of incidental litigation though they are also different in choosing concrete patterns. Incidental litigation is based on the theory of ＂Unity of Court Judgment＂. Theoretically speaking, incidental litigation is applied to avoid drawing a contradictory conclusion in the procedure of civil and administrative lawsuits; and in practice it is referred to meet the economical principle of litigation. However, the theoretical base is not surely sound all the time. This artide puts forward the assumption that civil suit and administrative suit should be settled respectivdy whenever they are interlaced.

关 键 词：行政 民事交织重合案件 附带诉讼 法院判决统一 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]