检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:时中[1]
机构地区:[1]辽宁大学哲学与公共管理学院,辽宁沈阳110036
出 处:《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年第2期6-9,共4页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:随着人类生存环境危机日益严峻,人开始反思自己曾经奉行的人类中心主义的得与失,于是出现了各种非人类中心主义思潮。其中,生态伦理学和生态哲学关于“人类中心主义论”和“非人类中心主义论”的论争尤具代表性。从表面上看,二者观点似乎是对立的,其实,二者的目的是一致的,都是要解决人与自然的关系问题。二者的争论是非常有意义的,通过二者的争论,促使人类理性地进行自我定位,努力探寻并走向一种“合理”的人类中心主义,或称为可持续发展的人类中心主义。As the crisis of the environment for human's existence becomes increasingly severe, people begin to rethink the gains and losses brought about by anthropocentrism and all kinds of non-anthropo- centrism follow. Among them the dispute between ecological ethics ad ecological philosophy on anthropocentrism and non-anthropocentrism is very noticeable. Apparently, the two views are opposite, but their aims are the same, that is to solve the problems between human and nature. This significant dispute between the two views impels human to revalue them reasonably and to try to develop "rational" anthropocentrism, namely, the anthropocentrism for sustainable development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28