检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山东农业大学动物科技学院,泰安271018 [2]山东省嘉祥县畜牧局
出 处:《中国人兽共患病学报》2006年第3期243-245,共3页Chinese Journal of Zoonoses
摘 要:目的比较瑞氏、姬姆萨、吖啶橙染色法以及PCR法对附红细胞体的检出率,探索比较可靠的检测附红细胞体的方法。方法以瑞氏、姬姆萨、吖啶橙染色法以及PCR法检测附红细胞体病的方法的建立为基础,对20例病例用四种方法进行检测,并比较其检出率。结果瑞氏、姬姆萨、吖啶橙染色法以及PCR法的检出率分别为20%、30%、85%、80%,PCR与三种染色法的符合率分别为35%、50%、95%。结论吖啶橙及PCR法优于瑞氏及姬姆萨氏染色法。The detection rates of the staining methods with Wright, Giemsa and acridine stains were compared in order to search for a reliable method to detect the presence of Eperythrozoon. It was found that the positive rates of these 4 methods of detection in 20 blood specimens of patients with Eperythrozoon disease were 20 %, 30 %, 85 % and 80 % respectively, and the consistency rates of PCR assay with the 3 staining methods were 35 %, 50 % and 95 % respectively, indicating that the acridine staining method and PCR assay were better than Wright and Giemsa staining methods for the detection of Eperythrozoon in clinical specimens.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.154.250