从三种模式看西方中心主义的狭隘性  

To Look on the Narrow-mindedness of Western Centralization from Three Patterns

作　　者：萧平汉[1] 

机构地区：[1]衡阳师范学院经济与法律系,湖南衡阳421001

出　　处：《衡阳师范学院学报》2006年第1期102-106,共5页Journal of Hengyang Normal University

基　　金：湖南省教育厅科研课题(03C110)

摘　　要：西方学术界在研究中国近代史中使用了三种基本模式,即“冲击—回应”、“传统—近代”和“帝国主义”模式。其前提建立在西方是先进楷模,其内部存在着促进社会发展的动力系统的假设之上。他们认为：现代化就是西方化,西方道路就是全世界所走的道路,中国只有全盘西化才能走向现代化。三种模式的核心就是西方中心主义。In the western academic circles, three patterns are used in the course of research on China＇s modern history. They are ＂charge-response＂, ＂the past-modern times＂ and ＂imperialism＂ . It is based on the hypothesis that the west is the advanced example and has a dynamic system that cnables the society to advance. It is assumed that modernization is to westernize and the western approach is the only one that the globe should follow. To make things worse, it is thought that only wholesale westernization can China realize the modernization. The heart of the three patterns is western centralization.

关 键 词：三种模式 西方中心主义 狭隘性 

分 类 号：K0[历史地理—历史学]