检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:成军[1] 谢珏[2] 王国政[1] 孙长贵[1] 葛海峰[3] 孙关忠[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第一一七医院检验科,杭州310013 [2]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院,杭州310003 [3]温州医学院检验系,2005届毕业生325000
出 处:《国际检验医学杂志》2006年第3期203-205,共3页International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基 金:南京军区医学科研"十五"计划课题(02MB018)
摘 要:目的探讨HBV标志物单项抗-HBc-IgG(抗-HBc)阳性结果的临床意义。方法对微粒子酶免分析(MEIA)检测5213例、ELISA检测594例住院患者HBV标志物总抗-HBc阳性率和单项抗-HBc阳性率进行回顾性统计;对MEIA检测的124例单项抗-HBc阳性和167例HBV标志物全阴性住院患者的抗-HBs水平进行分析;对ELISA筛选的97例流行病学意义的单项抗-HBc阳性血清标本采用含10%小牛血清PBS进行稀释后分别采用ELlSA和MEIA检测抗-HBc并进行比较。结果ELISA检测抗-HBc“流行病学意义”和“临床意义”的总抗-HBc阳性率及单项抗-HBc阳性率分别为72.1%、16.3%和62.6%、7.6%。MEIA检测抗-HBc的总抗-HBc阳性率及单项抗-HBc阳性率分别为78.1%、13.2%;MEIA检测HBV标志物单项抗-HBc阳性组和HBV标志物全阴性组的抗-HBs结果。差异有统计学意义(χ^2=86.9,P〈0.001),ELISA筛选的97例单项抗-HBc阳性标本不同倍数稀释后ELISA和MEIA检测抗-HBc结果提示,未稀释或低倍稀释存在较高的非特异性反应,高倍稀释则存在较高的漏检率。结论不同方法单项抗-HBc阳性率存在一定的差异,单项抗-HBc阳性可作为乙肝病毒感染的证据,但存在一定比例的非特异性反应和假阴性,日常工作中ELISA检测抗-HBc以5~10倍稀释为宜。Objective To discuss the clinical significance of anti HBc-IgG(anti-HBc) only posi tivity of HBV markers in serum. Methods The total and the isolated anti-HBc positive rate were calculated retrospectively from 5 213 and 594 inpatients' serum samples determined for five HBV markers including HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, anti-HBe and anti-HBc by microparticle enzyme immunoassay ( MEIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA), respectively. The levels of anti-HBs were analysed in 167 five-HBV-marker negative and 124 anti-HBc-only positive subjects determined for five HBV markers by MEIA. Making a dilution with range from 2 to 30-fold with the phosphate buffer system containing 10% bovine calf serum to 97 serum samples with epidemiological anti-HBc only pos itivity screened from 594 inpatients determined for five HBV markers by ELISA,and anti-HBc of the dilute serum samples were determined by ELISA and MEIA, respectively. Results The total and the isolated anti-HBc positive rate with epidemiological and clinical significance by ELISA were 72. 1% ,16.3% and 62. 6%, 7. 6%, respectively. The total and the isolated anti-HBc positive rate by MEIA were 78. 1% and 13. 2%, respectively. The difference of anti-HBs levels between five-HBV-marker negative and anti HBc only positive subjects determined for anti-HBs by MEIA was significant(χ^2= 86.9,P〈0. 001). There were higher nonspecific reactivity rate in low fold dilution and higher false negative rate in high-fold dilution to anti-HBc only seropositive samples by ELISA and MEIA. Conclusion The differences of anti-HBc positive rate exist among methods for determing HBV markers in serum. The anti-HBc only seropositivity by EILSA and MEIA is a evidence for HBV infection,and for the purpose of avoiding nonspecific reactivity and false negativity,a 5 or 10 fold dilution is feasible to determine anti-HBc by ELISA.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.30.154