两种艾滋病预防教育方式效果的比较  

Comparison of two kinds of education modes of AIDS prevention

作　　者：赵清秀[1] 魏国志[1] 聂素滨[1] 宋笑扬[2] 崔永亮[2] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学医务处,吉林长春130012 [2]吉林大学学生,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《中国健康教育》2006年第3期197-199,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Education

基　　金：吉林大学与国家红十字会;荷兰红十字会;吉林省红十字会的合作项目(No.51290)

摘　　要：目的为改进大学生艾滋病教育模式,对大学生艾滋病教育的两种方式———专题讲座和同伴教育进行比较分析。方法以问卷调查和随机访谈的形式对非医学专业的大学生进行两种教育方式效果的调查。结果在授课时间(2学时/12学时)、教育成本(600元/5000元)、教育效果、技能的掌握等方面两者存在差异,如对同学婚前性行为不介意两组差异显著(专题讲座为78.4%,同伴教育为55.0%,P<0.01),安全套的使用技能两组差异显著(专题讲座正确率为4.3%,同伴教育正确率为87.5%,P<0.01)。结论对非医学专业大学生来说,两种教育方式各有所长及不足,在知识积累与时间之比,大课的专题讲座优于同伴教育模式。Objective To compare the effectiveness of two kinds of education modes-special topic lecture and peer education in order to improve the mode of AIDS education for college students. Methods Questionnaire survey and randora interviews were conducted among non-medical students divided into 2 groups-special topic lecture group and peer education group. Results There were difference between special topic lecture group and peer education group in aspects of course time, education cast, education result and the acquirement of the skills. 78.4% of special topic lecture group didn ＇ t mind sexual behavior before marriage among other schoolmates, nor did 55.0% peer education group. There was significant difference in correct rate of condom use between special topic lecture group （4.3%） and peer education group （87.5%, P〈0.01 ）. Conclusion There were advantage and disadvantage in both special topic lecture and peer education. But students accepting special topic lecture could obtain more knowledge and save more time than those of peer education.

关 键 词：艾滋病 预防 教育方式 

分 类 号：R512.91[医药卫生—内科学]