检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘俐俐[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学文学院,天津300071
出 处:《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年第2期1-5,共5页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究2003年度博士点基金项目"叙事性文本研究中社会文化内涵与文学性关系的新拓展"(03JB750.11-44020)
摘 要:文章以探寻赵树理短篇小说《催粮差》艺术价值构成机制为主要目的,在细读基础上进行了文本分析。以结构主义研究方法为分析的总体思路,先在分解的层次上对每个故事作民间故事类型探源性分析,然后再从整体组合的层次上探索意义产生的机制。文章在分解的层次上发现了笨人的故事和聪明人的故事均是由民间故事类型脱胎衍化而来,并且各自相对独立,这是当今读者依然感到有趣味的根本艺术原因,文章在组合的层次上发现了笨人故事和聪明人故事的对比组合是产生社会意义的关键,也是文学批评从分析走向价值判断的通道。《催粮差》的审美接受具有层次性。The article is a text analysis of the short story Cui Liang Chai written by Zhao Shu-li. Based on close reading, the analysis aims to discover the mechanism of artistic value. The structuralist method is employed, first to analyze the stories separately, tracing their root in corresponding types of folklore, then to reveal the mechanism of meaning in their combination. It is found that the story of the stupid person and that of the bright person evolve separately from different types of folklore, which is the very reason why readers today still find it interesting. What's more, the contrast between the story of the stupid person and that of the bright person produces the social significance. Thus literary criticism steps from text analysis to value judgment. The aesthetic reception of Cui Liang Chai is at different levels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13