检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢少锋[1] 王忱[1] 刘怀萍[1] 邱树彬[1]
机构地区:[1]汕头大学医学院第二附属医院麻醉科,广东515041
出 处:《中国中西医结合杂志》2006年第3期251-252,共2页Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨针麻仪辅助定位行臂丛神经阻滞的效果。方法120例上肢手术的患者随机分为两组,每组60例,两组均用0.375%布比卡因25ml行肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞。A组用针麻仪辅助定位,B组用异感方法定位。结果A组神经阻滞完全56例(93.3%),阻滞不全4例;B组神经阻滞完全46例(76.6%),阻滞不全9例,无效5例,神经阻滞成功率A组明显高于B组(P<0.01)。结论针麻仪辅助定位行臂丛神经阻滞比异感方法定位准确,阻滞成功率较高。Objective To investigate the effect of electro-acupuncture-anesthesia device (EAAD) as an auxiliary localizing method for brachiplex nerve blocking. Methods One hundred and twenty patients scheduled for operation in upper limbs were randomly divided into group A and group B, 60 in each group. Bupivacaine 25 ml (0. 375 % in concentration) was used to block intermuscular plexus braehialis in the operation for anesthesia and EAAD was used for adjunctive localizing in group A, while in group B paresthesia elieitation was used. Results In group A, the blocking was complete in 56 cases and incomplete in 4, the anesthesia effect was supe riot to that in group B, complete in 46, incomplete in 9, and of inefficient in 5 ( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion EAAD provides a localizing method for plexus braehialis blocking more precise than paresthesia elicitation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28