检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘跃进[1]
出 处:《杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2006年第1期43-48,共6页Journal of Hangzhou Teachers College(Humanities and Social Sciences)
摘 要:近几年来中国古典文学的研究呈现出两个鲜明的变化,即我们已经不满足于对浅层次艺术感的简单追求,而更加注重厚实的历史感;同时,我们也已经不满足于对某些现成理论的盲目套用,而更加注重文献的积累。由此,中国古典文学的研究呈现出向传统文献学回归的迹象。然而,从某种意义上说,传统文献学已经远远不能适用于新时代的需要。电子文献、出土文献、国外文献为传统文献学添加了许多新的内容,同时并为中国古典文学的研究超越传统文献提供了可能。In recent years, Chinese classical literary studies has witnessed two distinct changes, that is, we would focus on the cultivation of a strong sense of history rather than simply make artistically shallow explorations, and focus on the accumulation of literary documents rather than indiscriminately apply ready-made theories. This symbolizes the return of Chinese classical literary studies to the traditional philology. However, to a certain extent, traditional philology can not meet the needs as required in the new era. Electronic documents, unearthed documents and foreign documents have enriched the scope of traditional philology, which has created an opportunity for Chinese classical literary studies to go beyond the limitation of traditional documents.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.206