回归与超越——漫议中国文学研究中的历史感问题  被引量:4

Return and Go beyond——On the Sense of History in Chinese Literary Studies

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘跃进[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院文学研究所,北京100732

出  处:《杭州师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2006年第1期43-48,共6页Journal of Hangzhou Teachers College(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘  要:近几年来中国古典文学的研究呈现出两个鲜明的变化,即我们已经不满足于对浅层次艺术感的简单追求,而更加注重厚实的历史感;同时,我们也已经不满足于对某些现成理论的盲目套用,而更加注重文献的积累。由此,中国古典文学的研究呈现出向传统文献学回归的迹象。然而,从某种意义上说,传统文献学已经远远不能适用于新时代的需要。电子文献、出土文献、国外文献为传统文献学添加了许多新的内容,同时并为中国古典文学的研究超越传统文献提供了可能。In recent years, Chinese classical literary studies has witnessed two distinct changes, that is, we would focus on the cultivation of a strong sense of history rather than simply make artistically shallow explorations, and focus on the accumulation of literary documents rather than indiscriminately apply ready-made theories. This symbolizes the return of Chinese classical literary studies to the traditional philology. However, to a certain extent, traditional philology can not meet the needs as required in the new era. Electronic documents, unearthed documents and foreign documents have enriched the scope of traditional philology, which has created an opportunity for Chinese classical literary studies to go beyond the limitation of traditional documents.

关 键 词:古典文献 电子文献 出土文献 国外文献 学术观念 

分 类 号:I206.2[文学—中国文学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象