转让合同效力与善意取得构成的立法选择——基于立法技术的考量  

Legislative Choice on the Relation between the Effectiveness of Contract for Transaction and Construction of Acquisition in Good Faith

作　　者：蔡立东[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2006年第2期59-66,共8页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(04CFX019)

摘　　要：善意取得成立于转让合同仅有让与人无权让与、而无其他引发转让合同效力瑕疵的场合,但在无权处分影响合同效力因素的既定约束下,若把转让合同的有效性作为善意取得的构成要件将会导致该制度的空转。借鉴大陆法系国家的成功经验,在转让合同效力与善意取得构成关系的问题上,我国物权立法的最佳选择是回避转让合同有效与无权处分持续存在的相互排斥,通过对登记或占有效力的特别规定,拟制受让人善意、占有保护或登记的公信力具有补足因无权处分而导致的物权变动法律原因不足的效力,以解决善意取得制度面对的特殊问题。The acquisition in good faith establishes on the ground that the unentitled disposition is the unique causation that results in the flaw of the effectiveness of contract for transaction. If we. regard the effectiveness of contract for transaction as the necessary composing term of the acquisition in good faith, the latter would not exert function because the unentitled disposition factor that cause the flaw of the effectiveness of contract for transaction. Referring to the successful experience of the continental legal system, in order to solve the specific problem that acquisition in good faith faces, the most suitable choice of the property law in China should be sliding over the mutual influence between the effectiveness of contract for transaction and the continuance of the unentitled disposition and imitating the good faith of transferee and the possession or registration＇ s indications validity have the effectiveness complementing the deficiency of causation of the property transference.

关 键 词：善意取得 无权处分 转让合同 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]