检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹新向[1]
出 处:《中国人口·资源与环境》2006年第2期70-75,共6页China Population,Resources and Environment
基 金:河南省教育厅自然基金(编号:2004601044);河南大学校内基金(编号:04YBRW019)联合资助
摘 要:对旅游地生态安全状况进行评价具有重要的理论意义和实践意义,根据生态足迹模型,构建了旅游地生态安全评价的指标体系和方法,并以人均旅游生态足迹和人均旅游用地承载力的比值I来确定旅游地生态安全的状况。以开封市为研究区域,采用以上指标体系,对开封市2004年旅游生态安全状况进行了评价。研究结果表明:2004年开封市人均生态旅游足迹为0.014983 hm2,其中交通足迹最大,占到85.53%;其次是餐饮,为9.75%。人均旅游用地承载力为0.041 790hm2,生态安全度为0.36,处于一种一般状态或者说较为安全的状态。对研究结果采用旅游环境容量来进行判断,也表明研究结果较为准确地反映旅游地生态安全状况。Assessing ecological security of tourism destination has an important meaning both in theory and in practice,and it is a precondition and foundation for the study of ecological security. Based on the ecological footprint model, the paper designed a series of indexes system to assess ecological security and set up a ratio I to make sure the situation of ecological security, took Kaifeng City as an example, adopted the method of ecological footprint analysies and constructed an evaluation method and indexes system. The result showed: Average ecological footprint of every person was 0.014983 hm^2 in 2004, first transporttaking 85.53%, and food and drink 9.75%. Average person tourism land carrying capacity was 0.041790hm^2 and ecological security degree was 0.64 which showed it was in a safer condition. Compared to tourism environment capacity and synthetically indexes method, the result was more reasonable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222