检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国药房》2006年第7期508-509,共2页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:评价4种抗菌药物用药方案预防剖宫产术后感染的成本-效果。方法:对我院1066例产科剖宫产术后应用A(头孢哌酮钠/舒巴坦钠+甲硝唑)、B(氨苄西林钠/舒巴坦钠+甲硝唑)、C(头孢拉定+甲硝唑)、D(头孢哌酮钠/舒巴坦钠)4种方案预防感染,进行回顾性成本-效果分析。结果:4种方案成本分别为4954.13、4752.77、3870.16、3988.22元;有效率分别为98.5%、87.4%、84.6%、96.8%;成本-效果比分别为50.30、54.38、45.75、41.20;A、B、D方案相对于C方案的增量成本-效果比分别为77.98、315.22、9.68。结论:D方案预防剖宫产术后感染较为经济、合理。OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost effectiveness of 4 antibacterials in the prevention of post - operative infection in patients with uterine- incision delivery(UID) .METHODS: A total of 1 066 cases with UID were ascribed to receive cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium + arilin (therapy A), ampicillin sodium/sulbactam sodium + arilin(B), cefradine + arilin(C) and cefoperazone sodium/sulbactam sodium(D), respectively for the prevention of infection. The cost effectiveness of the 4 groups was analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The costs of the 4 schemes were 4 954.13 yuan, 4 752.77 yuan, 3 870.16 yuan and 3 988.22 yuan, respectively; The effective rates were 98.5%, 87.4%, 84.6% and 96.8%, respectively; The cost-effectiveness ratios were 50.30, 54.38, 45.75 and 41.20, respectively ;The incremental cost - effectiveness ratios of scheme A, B and D were 77.98, 315.22 and 9,68, respectively as against scheme C. CONCLUSIONS: Scheme D is more economical and reasonable in the prevention of post- operative infection in patients with UID.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.224.194