《文献通考·经籍考》“诸评具载”的独特方式  

The Novel Way of Seeking Comments from All Sides: Verifying Documents·Confucian Classics

作　　者：杨寄林[1] 董文武[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北师范大学历史文化学院

出　　处：《史学月刊》2006年第4期72-81,共10页Journal of Historical Science

摘　　要：“诸评具载”构成了《文献通考·经籍考》所创立的“辑录体解题”的基本特征,而作者马端临独辟蹊径地综合采用五种方式来进行:高频率突出名流谛论,披沙式处断一家之说,整合性施用缀集技巧,网络化增立重要条目,双轨型创设编列格式。由此便确有保证地实现了欲使世人对文化典籍“殚见洽闻”的辑录目的,更理想地完成了《经籍考》在《文献通考》全书中所承担的学术文化史、意识形态史的使命,并为历史编纂学注入了有益的因子。这样导致文献提要学在宋末元初实现了重大突破和质的飞跃,从而进入了一个前所未有的深广境界。Seeking comments from all sides was the essential feature of the summary of compilatory style established by Verifying Documents · Confucian Classics. Ma Duanlin, the writer, who exercised his inventive mind, adopted five kinds of unprecedented methods., stressing the true meaning of the eminent persons with high frequency; settling the particular school of thought like dropping in level; using the compilatory skill like healing; adding the major clauses like spanning; and creating the arranging form with double track. Thus he succeeded in the goal of enriching the acknowledge about the classics, finished the mission of the history of learning and ideology by compiling Verifying Documents · Confucian Classics, and poured new factor into the catalogue methodology, made a great breakthrough and an essential leap in the study on the summary of documents.

关 键 词：《文献通考·经籍考》 诸评具载 独特方式 历史编纂学 文献提要学 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]