检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱慧如[1] 陈景繁[1] 易新平[1] 陈彪[1]
机构地区:[1]柳州市中医院,广西柳州545001
出 处:《腹腔镜外科杂志》2006年第2期132-133,共2页Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术的优点、方法及适应证。方法:应用腹腔镜手术设备及纤维胆道镜为29例胆总管结石患者行腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术,不置T管引流,一期缝合胆总管壁。结果:26例手术成功,平均手术时间98.2m in,术中平均出血15.3m l,术后平均肛门排气时间19.6h,术后平均住院8.3d,无胆漏等严重并发症发生,3例中转行腹腔镜胆总管切开取石T管引流术。结论:应用腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术治疗胆管结石具有创伤小、住院时间短及并发症少的优势,对符合适应证的患者是一种安全、有效的术式,但应掌握操作技巧以提高手术成功率、防止胆漏的发生。Objective:To explore the value, method and indication of laparoscopic choledochotomy and primary ductal suhmucosa closure. Methods:The clinical data of twenty-nine patients with common bile duct calculi underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy and primary ductal submucosa closure without routine T-tube drainage was retrospectively analyzed. Results :Twenty-six cases were successfully accomplished the operation but 3 cases converted to T-tube drainage. The mean operating time, blood loss and postoperative hosptalization were 98.2min, 15.3ml and 8.3d respectively. There were no severe complications occured in the patients who underwent primary closure. Conclusions.Laparoscopic choledochotomy and primary ductal submucosa closure has the advantage of less invasion, less complication and shorter hospitalization. It is a safe and effective operation for patients who have the indication.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229