检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟开斌[1]
出 处:《公共管理学报》2006年第2期70-75,共6页Journal of Public Management
基 金:北京市哲学社会科学"十五"规划项目(04BJDZH050)
摘 要:改革开放以来,在重特大矿难事故频发的同时,地方瞒报等虚假治理现象也非常突出,成为中国煤矿安全监管面临的一个严峻挑战。引入了一个有关地方政府治理选择的模型,集中分析煤矿安全监管中地方官员基于成本-收益原则与中央与地方之间委托-代理关系基础上的行为选择;通过比较地方政府虚假治理和诚实治理的成本和收益,揭示了影响地方政府治理选择的因素及其作用过程。结论表明,在当前的制度背景下,虚假治理很可能在一定程度上、一定范围内成为地方的普遍选择,为此,需要进一步改革和调整中国煤矿安全监管制度,强化国家制度建设。The actual number of fatal accidents in China's coal-mining industry could be much higher. Meanwhile, a lot of accidents are widespread underreported and covered up by local government officials and mine owners, which is a great challenge for China's coal-mining security supervision. This paper constructs a model of local government governance to analyze the dishonest behavior of local government officials and mine owners based on cost-benefit analysis and principal-agent relationship. It aims to show the factors that influence local government governance and their functions and hopes to generate insights on the boundaries and strategies of the local governments and the society in the context of social regulation. It is demonstrated that local officials, with the aid and knowledge of mine owners, have strong incentive to cover up deaths at their jurisdictions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.28.197