检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李春光[1] 郑宏[1] 王水林[1] 葛修润[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学重点实验室,武汉430071
出 处:《力学与实践》2006年第2期57-61,共5页Mechanics in Engineering
基 金:923课题(2002CB412708);中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(CQ110401)项目;湖北省杰出青年基金(2002S2164)资助
摘 要:根据脆性材料微粒对之间距离超过特定距离而破坏的微观机理,结合宏细观试验结果指出的绝大多数的破坏颗粒对的方向与σ1的方向之间的夹角都大于0°这一事实,导出了新的脆性材料张破坏准则: σ1+ασ2+βσ3≤[σ],式中系数β与材料的优势角θ(破坏颗粒对的方向与σ1的方向之间的夹角的某种平均) 和泊松比μ有关.同时还指出了经典强度理论由于没有考虑优势角从而导致了它们与宏观实验结果不符.实验结果表明,在张破坏条件下此准则比经典的准则有更高的精度.It is indicated by macroscopical and microscopical experiments that most of the directions of failure particle pair are not consistent with the direction of the first principal stress. According to the microscopic mechanics with respect to brittle materials' tensile failure, the material will begin to decompose if the distance between pair particles exceeds their attraction distance. Based on the above facts, a new strength criterion of brittle materials' tensile failure is derived, which can be written as: σ1-+ασ2+βσ3≤[σ], in which the coefficients are dependent on the predominant angle and Poisson's ratio. It is pointed out that the reason why the classical criteria disagree with experiments is that the predominant angle is not considered in the classical criteria. The new criterion is shown to be more accurate than the classical criteria for tensile failure of brittle materials by experiments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200