吸附法与喷涂法在室内环境治理中的对比研究  

Comparison Study on Indoor Environment Treatment Methods by Adsorption Method and Spray Method

作　　者：陶爱荣[1] 丁轲轲[1] 虞萍 葛均[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京工程学院动力工程系 [2]南京长江机器集团

出　　处：《建筑热能通风空调》2006年第2期83-85,103,共4页Building Energy & Environment

基　　金：江苏省建设厅2004年科技项目(JS2004ZD07)

摘　　要：本文以室内环境治理中甲醛清除为例,分别采用数值模拟方法及实验方法,对比研究了活性炭吸附法与光触媒喷涂法的治理效果。研究表明,光触媒喷涂法对室内甲醛有明显的分解作用,在相同的时间段内,可大幅降低室内空气中甲醛浓度。相比之下,活性炭吸附法虽然价格便宜,设置位置灵活,但见效较慢,且只对吸附装置附近区域有较明显的效果。This paper discusses the effects of active carbon adsorption and light accelerant spray in eliminating indoor formaldehyde by use of mathematical simulation and experiments respectively, Related results indicate that light accelerant may decompose indoor formaldehyde and reduce its concentration obvioust. during the same period, while active carbon adsorption has effect mainly among adjacent region despite of its low price and convenience about arrangement.

关 键 词：活性炭 吸附法 光触媒 喷涂法 室内环境治理 甲醛 

分 类 号：X51[环境科学与工程—环境工程]