检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宁连举[1] 杨庆丰[2] 石文华[1] 吕廷杰[2]
机构地区:[1]北京邮电大学文法经济学院,北京100876 [2]北京邮电大学经济管理学院,北京100876
出 处:《北京邮电大学学报》2006年第2期62-64,共3页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
摘 要:主要研究互联网骨干网之间的互联决策.为了分析2个互联网骨干网运营商(IBP)在互联过程中的行为表现,运用博弈论的方法,通过建立一个非合作博弈模型分析他们的互联决策.结论表明,当市场结构比较对称时厂商的理性行为是符合政府期望的.而当市场结构极不对称时显然厂商的行为是有悖于政府期望,一方面政府强制厂商之间的互联;另一方面也是最重要的,就是政府鼓励弱势IBP或ISP(互联网服务提供商)之间的互联以降低市场的不对称性,使厂商的行为符合政府及广大消费者的期望,这样才能从根本上解决互联互通问题.To analyze behavior of two Internet backbone provider(IBP) in the course of interconnection, a non-cooperative game model to analyze the interconnection decision between two IBP was developed. The conclusions show that the rational behaviors of the providers accord with the government when the market structure is relative symmetric, but when the market structure is extremely asymmetric the providers' behaviors are contrary to expectations of the government. The government forced interconnection between the providers; on the other hand, more importantly, the government should encourage interconnection between weak IBP or ISP in order to reduce asymmetry of market. It makes the behaviors of the providers accord with the expectations of the government and the consumers, only in this situation, the interconnection problem can be solved fundamentally.
分 类 号:F019.11[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222