对“劳动价值论”争论双方的质疑  

Questioning the Two Parties of the "Value Theory of Work" Dispute

作　　者：胡义成[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西省社会科学院,陕西西安710065

出　　处：《广东商学院学报》2006年第2期4-8,共5页Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies

摘　　要：经典马克思主义的价值理论与其唯物史观相统一,承认生产力决定性原理。《资本论》展述的价值理论体系实际是“生产力价值论”。在表达方法上它遵循“从抽象上升为具体”和“逻辑与历史统一”的原则,从抽象的劳动价值论出发,逐渐上升到对市场价格的具体把握。从劳动价值论推出剩余价值论,只是“生产力价值论”体系在某些限制下产生的一个支论,它并不否定生产力和使用价值的决定性。但近年来国内围绕劳动价值论形成的许多研究成果,只把劳动价值论视为马克思主义政治经济学的“基础”,不能解释《资本论》一系列明确的论断,不能适应社会主义市场经济发展的新要求。The value theory of classic Marxism and its historical materialism are a unified whole, acknowledging productivity decisive principle. The value theory system expounded in＂Das Kapital＂ is actually ＂productivity value theory＂. In way of expression it follows the principle of ＂rising from abstract to concrete＂ and ＂logic and history unification＂. Beginning from the abstract value theory of work, it gradually rises to a concrete understanding of market price. Inferred from value theory of work, surplus value theory is only a sub-theory created in the frame of ＂value theory of productive forces＂ under some limitations. It does not negate the determining nature of productivity forces and use value. But some recent studies fail to realize all that.

关 键 词：劳动价值论 生产力价值论 经典马克思主义 

分 类 号：F014.2[经济管理—政治经济学]