检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方涌[1]
出 处:《安徽警官职业学院学报》2006年第1期34-36,共3页Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
摘 要:目前,我国在合同解释问题上存在诸多问题,如解释的目的不明确;解释的原则过于抽象而且缺乏层次性,具体的规则可操作性不强;解释的范围界定不合理以及未能准确把握解释的发展趋势。上述问题导致法官享有的裁量权过大。本文试从以上几方面存在的问题出发,提出几点完善的建议。At present, our contract law exists many problems on contract explanation system. Such as, the purpose of the explanation is not explicit, the principle of the explanation is too abstract and lack of the layer,the concrete rule maneuverability is not strong, and the explanatory scope definition is not reasonable and can not grasp accurately of the development trend. The above mentioned problems cause judge overpossess the power of decision. This text tries to set out from above problems with existent aspects,putting forward several suggestions to perfect this.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127