检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈伟兰[1] 李瑞珍[1] 李艳芳[1] 邓红珠[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第三医院药剂科,广州市510630
出 处:《中国药房》2006年第9期673-674,共2页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:评价抑郁症3种药物治疗方案的成本-效果。方法:将我院120例门诊抑郁症患者分为A、B、C组,分别给予氯米帕明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林后观察疗效,并运用成本-效果法进行分析。结果:3组成本分别为702、1008、765元,有效率分别为77%、82%、90%(P>0.05),成本-效果比分别为9.12、12.29、8.50。结论:C组方案治疗抑郁症成本-效果比更优。OBJECTIVE: To conduct cost -effectiveness analyses on 3 therapeutic schemes for depression. METHODS: A total of 120 cases with melancholia were ascribed to receive clomipramine (group A), paroxetine (group B) and sertraline (group C), respectively, the curative effects were observed analyzed by cost-effectiveness method. RESULTS: The costs for 3 groups were 702 yuan, 1 008 yuan and 765 yuan, respectively, the effective rates were 77%, 82% and 90% (P〉 0.05), respectively,and the cost- effectiveness ratios were 9.12,12.29 and 8.50, respectively. CONCLUSION: Group C is superior in terms of the cost-effectiveness ratio among the 3 regimes for depression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28