检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱汉章[1] 权伍成[1] 张秀芬[2] 乔晋琳[3] 刘忠建[4] 付平[1] 由松[1]
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学针灸学院,北京100029 [2]武警北京总队第二医院 [3]海军总医院 [4]北京军区252医院
出 处:《中国针灸》2006年第5期316-318,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
基 金:国家中医药管理局中医临床诊疗技术整理与研究项目:国中医药科2002ZL47
摘 要:目的:对比针刀与针刺治疗颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:采用多中心临床随机对照试验方法,将患者分为针刀治疗组(在患椎上下棘间韧带和两侧后关节的关节囊处行针刀治疗)与针刺对照组(穴取落枕、阿是穴、颈夹脊等),在疗程结束时和治疗结束后6个月分别统计近、远期疗效。结果:针刀治疗组的近、远期有效率为91.3%、94.7%,针刺对照组分别为59.4%和56.6%,两组相比差异均有非常显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:针刀组治疗颈椎病与针刺组相比,其治疗效果更佳。Objective To compare therapeutic effects of needle-knife therapy and acupuncture on cervical spondylosis. Methods Multi-central clinical randomized controlled trial was adopted. The patients were divided into a needie-knife treatment group treated with needle-knife therapy at the upper and lower interspinal ligaments of the affected vertebral body and bilateral posterior joint capsules; and the acupuncture control group were treated with acupuncture at Laozhen, Ashi points and cervical Jiaji points, etc. The short-term and the long-term therapeutic effects were observed at the end of the therapeutic course and 6 months after the end of the therapeutic course. Results The short-term therapeutic effect and the long-term therapeutic effect were 91.3 % and 94.7% in the needle-knife treatment group and 59.4% and 56.6% in the acupuncture control group, respectively, with a very significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.01). Conclusion The needle-knife treatment in the therapeutic effect on cervical spondylosis is Superior to acupuncture treatment.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.111.52