传统自然垄断理论与现代自然垄断理论的比较及其启示  

The Caparison and its Enlightens between Traditional and Modern Natural Monopoly Theory

作　　者：钱龙[1] 周绍东[2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学经济与管理学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]南京财经大学经济学院,江苏南京210046

出　　处：《经济与管理》2006年第5期16-19,共4页Economy and Management

摘　　要：自然垄断产业具有特殊性质,在国民经济中具有举足轻重的作用。传统自然垄断理论和现代自然垄断理论对自然垄断产业有着不同的看法,两者判断自然垄断的标准分别是规模经济和成本弱增性。自然垄断理论的演进过程表明自然垄断产业的运作方式已经发生了改变。为了适应中国自然垄断产业的进一步发展,政府必须转变职能并实行政企分开,积极引入民间资本以推动自然垄断行业发展。Natural monopoly economics. Traditional natural estate has special characteristic, it plays an important role in national monopoly theory and modern natural monopoly theory have different opinions in natural monopoly estate, those citations to judge natural monopoly are scope economics and cost- increment respectively. The development of natural monopoly theory displays that the operation method has altered in the natural monopoly estate. In order to adapt to the further development of natural monopoly estate in China, government needs to transform its function and execute politics-enterprise separation, and to bring in private capital to advance the development of natural monopoly estate.

关 键 词：自然垄断 规模经济 成本弱增性 民营化 

分 类 号：F038.2[经济管理—政治经济学]