从物权与债权区分理论看我国民事立法选择  

Discrimination Theory of the Real Right and the Creditor's Rights

作　　者：胡可[1] 曹裕霖[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330047

出　　处：《河北青年管理干部学院学报》2006年第2期72-74,共3页Journal of Hebei Youth Administrative Cadres College

摘　　要：自德国民法典颁布以来,许多国家的民事立法都接受了物权与债权的区分理论,我国的传统民事立法和理论研究也一直是该区分理论的赞成者。可是随着社会生活的发展、进步,出现了物权与债权区分的相对性问题,因此一些学者主张在我国民法典的制定中拒绝接受物权与债权的区分理论。从物权与债权区分理论的发展出发,结合我国民事立法的传统与实际,我国的民法典应该采纳二元区分体系。Since the German Civil Code promulgated, many countries have accepted the discrimination theory of Real right and the Creditor＇ s rights in their civil legislations. Our traditional civil legislation and fundamental research also support this theory. But with development and improvement of social life, there appears the issue of discrimination relativity on the Real right and the Creditor＇s rights. Consequently, some scholars proclaim to refuse to accept the Real right and the Creditor＇s rights discrimination in our civil code formulation.This article advocate to adopt the dual discrimination system in our civil code based on the improvement of the theory and our legislation tradition and reality.

关 键 词：物权与债权的区分 支配权 请求权 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]